By Erna Kim Hackett | FiestyThoughts.com
Published in August of 2017
SUMMARY: A fiery piece of commentary that was penned in 2017. It lists three reasons – “individualistic theology, a sanitized version of history, and good old white centering” – why the author stopped talking about racial reconciliation and started talking about white supremacy.
KEY QUOTE: “The term white supremacy labels the problem more accurately. It locates the problem on whiteness and its systems. It focuses on outcomes not intentions. It is collective not individual. It makes whiteness uncomfortable and responsible. And that is important.”
DID YOU KNOW? We have curated numerous other articles on white privilege, take a look.
Read the full article at FiestyThoughts.com
More curated articles on white privilege:
ARTICLE: Explaining White Privilege to a Broke White Person
Penned from a person who grew up extremely poor the author sympathizes with why poor white people react vehemently against the term white privilege, but ultimately comes to the conclusion that white privilege does exist and perhaps why so many poor white people have a problem with the term is because classism is mixed up in the term.
Read more
ARTICLE: American Christianity’s White-Supremacy Problem
A thorough history of the church and its complicity with racism and white supremacy doctrine. An excellent starting point to learning about the church and racism working hand in hand. The next step would be to read or watch The Color of Compromise by Jemar Tisby.
Read more
ARTICLE: White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack
An excerpt from the paper that started it all. Instead of categorically dismissing intersectionality, read the original paper and come to an opinion yourself. We found it to be compelling and a useful exercise to answer the twenty six questions included in the excerpt.
Read more